Current development
Built is not the same as proven.
We distinguish working implementation, approved access, and measured quality. A deterministic test proves a boundary. It does not prove an AI will reliably solve an open-ended task.
| Area | Status | What that means |
|---|---|---|
| WHOOP connection | Private preview | Owner-scoped connection, normalized context, freshness, and access controls for approved accounts. |
| Daily Intelligence Brief | Owner-operated | Read-only evidence composition with temporal checks, bounded critique, and grounding verification. Not a clinical claim. |
| Personal Continuity | Owner-operated | Historical context and governed correction paths. History cannot override current owner truth. |
| Weather and schedule | Conditional | Relevant weather through an approved read. Schedule availability requires an authorized, functioning source; an empty or unavailable read is not proof of free time. |
| Prospect and career research | Owner-operated | Source-backed company research and sanitized career context. No general outreach or application authority. |
| Engineering workflows | Internal | Native source inspection, isolated edits, workflow checkpoints, and verification. Broad autonomous coding quality is not yet established. |
| Independent synthesis | Evaluation | Bounded specialist assessments and synthesis with cost, usage, and artifact accounting. Improvement must be measured, not assumed. |
Evidence standard
Measure the artifact.
Not the performance.
The same evidence, the same rubric
Compare a baseline with a reviewed result using fixed evidence and shared criteria. A critique only counts when it produces a traceable, useful change.
Failure remains part of the record
Unavailable evidence, interrupted operations, unknown usage, and failed verification must stay visible. A partial result is not silently promoted into success.
Tests are not live demonstrations
The examples on this website are illustrative and use no account data. They do not run Delta, prove model quality, or activate a connected service.
Still to prove
Useful autonomy,
earned one task at a time.
The next measure is whether Delta can deliver independently accepted work while using its existing tools, respecting authority, and catching downstream consequences. A larger capability registry is not the outcome.
- Real software deliverables with independent acceptance.
- Measured gains from specialist critique and synthesis.
- Reliable context across tasks without false current-state claims.
No claim of general autonomous operation, clinical validation, peer-reviewed efficacy, or superiority over other coding systems is made.
Your account. Your context.
Continue the conversation.
Private preview. Account-scoped context. Explicit approval for actions.